The speech is very simple: when I decide to give priority aid in households is evident that compresses those for citizens as individuals. But it is undisputed that
society today is based really on the family, for several reasons: it is a tradition thousands of years (an institution is virtually undetectable when you know the story), it is easier to help, just a monetary payment or some other kind of help to a group 3,4,5 to please people is politicaly correct because today everybody likes filling his mouth with the word "family", preferably traditional (traditional in the sense of tribe or polygamy?), and because almost everyone has a family, or as in Italy are a family unipersonale , it is clear that a force is legal.
the others? who thinks of others? those who do not have a family. Those who are obviously more difficult because more than to live alone receive less help from the state because they are considered less "useful" because "son".
I seem to feel an aunt who speaks rabbit breeder and says that the female does not "daughter" (birth) and so it is worth more because they do not roast it more useful to its aim of "producing new rabbits" .
Man can be seen as a tool State! E 'the State to be a man, is the state (with a capital S) that should help the most vulnerable citizens. Weakness resulting from any reason: economic, social, religious, psychological. Has to deal with him personally, as an individual, not his whole family, otherwise the aid pets to become a dislocated exploitation that takes place in the family that has to load one of its most individuals in difficulty.
northern Europe
This is the main difference between the social system of our country and one in northern Europe, there are no apartments for elderly carers but semi self-sufficient, there are young people in education are borne by the state, here the state takes care of its citizens in trouble because that is all he has to do, regardless of the good fortune to be part of a family or alone.
society today is based really on the family, for several reasons: it is a tradition thousands of years (an institution is virtually undetectable when you know the story), it is easier to help, just a monetary payment or some other kind of help to a group 3,4,5 to please people is politicaly correct because today everybody likes filling his mouth with the word "family", preferably traditional (traditional in the sense of tribe or polygamy?), and because almost everyone has a family, or as in Italy are a family unipersonale , it is clear that a force is legal.
the others? who thinks of others? those who do not have a family. Those who are obviously more difficult because more than to live alone receive less help from the state because they are considered less "useful" because "son".
I seem to feel an aunt who speaks rabbit breeder and says that the female does not "daughter" (birth) and so it is worth more because they do not roast it more useful to its aim of "producing new rabbits" .
Man can be seen as a tool State! E 'the State to be a man, is the state (with a capital S) that should help the most vulnerable citizens. Weakness resulting from any reason: economic, social, religious, psychological. Has to deal with him personally, as an individual, not his whole family, otherwise the aid pets to become a dislocated exploitation that takes place in the family that has to load one of its most individuals in difficulty.
northern Europe
This is the main difference between the social system of our country and one in northern Europe, there are no apartments for elderly carers but semi self-sufficient, there are young people in education are borne by the state, here the state takes care of its citizens in trouble because that is all he has to do, regardless of the good fortune to be part of a family or alone.
0 comments:
Post a Comment